This event has ended. View the official site or create your own event → Check it out
This event has ended. Create your own
View analytic
Saturday, September 26 • 4:10pm - 4:42pm
Understanding the Federal Communication Commission's Policy-Making Using Big Data

Sign up or log in to save this to your schedule and see who's attending!

Paper Link

The increasing availability of financial and consumer data through the internet as well as ever more accessible computing power to collect, organize, and analyze information has encouraged the widespread use of big data -- and has transformed all aspects of business from banking to retailing. On the other hand, big data has yet to play a role in our understanding of government, the administrative process, and policy-making.

In one of the first efforts to use big data to understand regulation and policy-making, we look to the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) and communications policy. In particular, we employ a unique data set representing the entire Electronic Comment Filing System (ECFS), a database that spans nearly three decades and includes virtually every formal submission to the FCC. Under agency regulation, all comments and other filings, including all replies, reports, applications, adjudication submissions, and, significantly, notices of ex parte meetings with commissioners and agency staff must be filed in ECFS. Our database has over 4 million specific records. In addition, we combine this database with another unique database derived from the official FCC Record, which publishes all agency action at a commission and bureau level.

Using various recursive regression techniques, we derive correlations between the activity of the commenters and ex parte meetings and agency action. Our tentative conclusions provide evidence on the drivers of FCC behavior. First, we find that comments and ex parte meeting are positively correlated with agency order production. While the causal arrow between these two variables is, of course, ambiguous, this result is expected given that comments and ex parte action likely both drive and anticipate agency action. On the other hand, we find significantly higher correlations between ex parte meetings and orders than comments and orders, suggesting a greater impact of ex parte meetings by elites as opposed to the broader community of commenters. This result has serious implications for how we understand the “democratic” nature of rule-making and other administrative practices.

Second, we extend this approach to examine correlations between FCC action and other variables. For instant, we examine how certain law firms and lobbying firms correlate with agency action. We also compare how these effects vary among the various FCC bureaus. We find variation in the correlations between particular firms and agency action, suggesting the existence of “insiders” at the FCC who have an advantage in getting the agency to do things.

Finally, we consider the role of correlation and big data analysis in policy formation. We argue from normative grounds that descriptive correlations offer a powerful tool to understanding institutions and how they form policy. These techniques deserve a wider acceptance in both legal scholarship and social science as big data becomes more easily available.


Geoffrey Why

Mintz Levin


Saturday September 26, 2015 4:10pm - 4:42pm
GMUSL - Room 221

Attendees (28)